Nous avons toutefois conservé nos barrettes mémoire G. This means the Ryzen 5 1600X should be a shoe-in for that middle ground between the eight-core Ryzens and cheaper quad-core processors. Moreover, its most direct competitor from Intel is beaten both for multi- and single-thread performance. Ryzen has proven more sensitive to memory bandwidth than Kaby Lake, but at launch many motherboards in the enthusiast X370 range wouldn't boot at higher memory speeds. Comparing the shows that the 7600K is 20% faster for single and quad core workloads but looses by 20% for multi-core workloads. But again all the reviewers seem to do it this way. I mostly play esports, Rocket League, might get into overwatch soon too, Lawbreakers e.
The slightly cheaper i3-7350K can be overclocked, but it is still limited to only two cores and four threads. The 1500X did a little better with 3% boost in single-thread and an 11% boost in multi-thread. Santiago Santiago was the reviewer, and he compared the Ryzen 5 1400 both stock and overclocked to 3. By virtue of its four cores, Ryzen 5 1500X isn't as fast as higher-end Ryzen processors in heavily threaded applications. It's an architecture that, like Intel's , doesn't command outright recommendation, but instead a more measured endorsement.
Overclocking the Ryzen processor will bring it far ahead of the Intel price-equivalent. Product links are fine, affiliate or referral links that benefit you are not. Additionally, in games that can use the extra threads, the Ryzen chip will have an advantage. The Core i5-7500 is in an even tougher position compared with the Ryzen 5 1500X. Sur notre plate-forme Intel de tests, nos modules mémoires G. Another key addition with Ryzen is simultaneous multithreading.
Source: The i5-7400 is noticeably slower than the i5 7500, which would mean that it would, on average, be slower in games than the Ryzen 5 1500X. A YouTuber known as recently made a comparing the performance of the i5-7400 and the Ryzen 5 1400. We will revisit this summary when we have more samples. That would, in theory, negate any possible performance issues that arise from Infinity Fabric, which is dependent on memory speed and clock speed. From the few results I have seen, the spire is only marginally better 3-5C better under load with a 3.
The total platform cost of the i3-8350K will be slightly higher than Ryzen or the i5-8400. This point was compounded when I bumped the resolution and detail settings up. Those haven't yet been released, but are expected soon. Les Ryzen 5 peuvent-ils mettre les Core i5 en danger pour un usage gaming? An overclocked 1500X serves up better gaming performance than the Core i5-7400. Also the odd open world game like Far Cry 4 and Homefront Revolution if that's any help. It may help compare relative performance across all cpus but I does not feel like relevant real word information. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a rating which is geared towards gamers.
Rule 7: Shitposts, memes, and plain box pictures are not allowed as linkposts you can still include them within normal posts or comments. Think of it as double boost, or adding a turbo to your super-charged engine. Given room to stretch its legs threads, Ryzen 5 easily outperforms the Core i7-7700K. I like Ryzen's 5 series a bit better than Intel's i5 series. I managed to get the 1500X running at a consistent 3. At stock clock rates or under conservative overclocks, it should be ample.
When it comes to synthetic tests like SiSoft Sandra, the R5 2400G makes hash out of the Intel. The Ryzen 5 1600X wins a majority of its non-gaming benchmarks against the Core i7-7700K and maintains high frame rates though not leadership in comparison to the Intel processor. The 1500X isn't as competitive in our Adobe and Encoding tests. Unfortunately, though, a locked ratio multiplier keeps you from easy overclocks. Once Tom's finally gets around to reviewing the 1400, they really should test its Stealth Cooler against the Spire, noting not only their max stable overclock and temperatures, but also their sound data at various load levels. It could even be its own article if they wanted.
Sans plus attendre, voici nos résultats de test. The problem here is that there are no B- or H-series motherboards on the market yet. Here we can see that taking the i3-8350K as base 100% performance, the Ryzen 5 1500X is on average 5% behind at 1080p. To be honest, I've never overclocked before and I doubt I'd really begin now so that's nothing I'd mess around with I don't think either is a wrong choice. However, you can very easily get a 10-15% overclock out of the Ryzen 1400, while the i5 is locked, so they should just about tie after overclocking.
From the few results I have seen, the spire is only marginally better 3-5C better under load with a 3. Since it is easily Over Clocked it would have similar single tread performance but with two more cores for only a bit more money. It's all exciting stuff and makes the 2000 Ryzen series, especially the Ryzen 5 family, rather enticing for system builders. In fact, the processor was noticeably cooler than I expected. In this regard, the 1500X is the sweet spot of the Ryzen range so far. Original articles are always better than a reddit textpost. All the Ryzen 5 processors are built on the same foundation, which also powers the Ryzen 7 chips.